7th April 2008


 Issue No.  2008/09



 Amendments to Sex Discrimination Act 1975

To comply with the Equal Treatment Directive (76/207/EEC), the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 has been amended and the changes came into force on 6th April 2008.  In summary, the changes are as follows.
Terms and Conditions during Maternity Leave
At the moment a pregnant employee is entitled to take 26 weeks Ordinary Maternity Leave (OML) followed by 26 weeks Additional Maternity Leave (AML). 
During OML, the employee must continue to receive all contractual benefits (e.g. gym membership, company car, etc.) with the exception of wages or salary (remuneration).
During AML, the continuation of any contractual benefits (e.g. gym membership, company car, etc.) is purely left to the employer to agree with the employee as part of the contract of employment.
New Rights
However, the Regulations that came into force on 6th April 2008 say that where the expected week of childbirth begins on or after 5th October 2008 the women will have greater rights in that during AML they will be entitled to the same (non pay) benefits as entitled during OML. 
This means that employers who do not currently provide non-cash benefits during AML will now be required to do so.
It is now discrimination if an employee is not eligibile for a bonus (or part of a bonus) payment because she is on compulsory maternity leave.
Definition of Sexual Harassment
The definition of sexual harassment has been widened (removing the phrase “on the ground of her sex” and adding the phrase “related to her sex or that of another person”). This means claims can now be made if the unwanted conduct ‘relates’ to the sex of the victim or any other person.
This enables claims to be made by witnesses who need not be the primary recipient of that conduct but who consider that their dignity has been violated or that the conduct creates an offensive and degrading environment for them.
Increased Liability for Employers for Third Party Harassment 
An employer aware of employees’ treatment by third parties is required to take ‘reasonably practicable steps’ to protect the employees from further harassment by third parties. 
Employers can be held liable if they fail to take appropriate action to prevent harassment specifically where harassment is known to have occurred on at least two previous occasions. The regulations state that liability will be incurred irrespective of whether the third party is the same or a different person on each occasion.
This is expected to have the biggest impact in the catering, hotel and retail trades.




Employment Law
Health & Safety
Personnel Issues
Management Training



Making sense of it all

Sentient - Training

Sentient adj ...

"capable of perception"

"capable of independent thought"

Please contact us at info@sentientuk.co.uk or call UK 08456 446006

To access our archive of previous E-mail Updates please click here.   Click here for details of our services available on our website. 

The advice and comment in this update is not meant to be an authoritative statement of law. The articles and summaries should not be applied to any specific set of facts and circumstances without seeking further advice. Whilst every care is taken to ensure that the content is correct Sentient cannot accept responsibility for the accuracy of statements made nor the result of any actions taken by individuals after reading such.

To unsubscribe to this information newsletter please click here and complete the unsubscribe form on our site.
Warning do not click this link unless you wish to be removed from this update newsletter.